“A blood test for depression”

You know, I would be as excited about a blood test for depression as anybody else out there – but something tells me that, despite all the jazzy press it’s getting,  a study with an n of 66 and an “82% success rate” (what does that even mean?) is probably not the answer.

The thing that bothers me the most about pop science reporting is how they never link to the journal article.  Ever.  And in this case, maybe there isn’t a journal article (pubmed brought up nothing but parathyroid stuff for “depression phosphoric acid”), but it’ll probably take me another 20 minutes of googling to be sure of it.

The thing that bothers me the second most about it is how the headlines never accurately report the content:

PhD Comics: so accurate.

The sad thing is, I always let myself get my hopes up when I see a cool headline like “A near-instant blood test for depression”.  But it never pans out.  Makes me think I’m crazy to still have hope that we’ll actually get there someday.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on ““A blood test for depression”

  1. What if the blood test is positive, but the patient doesn’t feel depressed and has no symptoms?

    Awkward.

  2. “What you don’t know about A can kill you.”

    “A causes B all the time. What will it mean for Obama?”

    “A killer among us.”

    Gee AP, I actually thought all these headlines were legit. Of course A causes B. Lighten up.

    *inwardly dying of laughter*

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s